With LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.If you're looking for DataStage Interview Questions & Answers for Experienced or Freshers, you are at the right place. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference Reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. See our list of best Data Integration Tools vendors. Alteryx Designer is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Palantir Foundry, SSIS, Informatica PowerCenter and SnapLogic, whereas IBM InfoSphere DataStage is most compared with SSIS, Talend Open Studio, Azure Data Factory, Informatica PowerCenter and AWS Glue. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere DataStage writes "Robust, easy to use, has a simple error logging mechanism, and works very well for huge volumes of data". The top reviewer of Alteryx Designer writes "Good analytics and data preparation and easy to set up". Alteryx Designer is rated 8.6, while IBM InfoSphere DataStage is rated 7.6. More IBM InfoSphere DataStage Pricing and Cost Advice »Īlteryx Designer is ranked 23rd in Data Integration Tools with 4 reviews while IBM InfoSphere DataStage is ranked 6th in Data Integration Tools with 8 reviews. We, however, would like to have some cost reduction." "It's very expensive." "The cost is too high." "The price is expensive but there are no licensing fees." "It's quite expensive." "It is quite expensive." For the mainframe, we are using the Db2 mainframe database, and we are spending around $1,000 on the Db2 mainframe database as well. Based on that, we are spending around $2,000 on the production environment and $1,000 on the lower environment for testing and development-side executions. They're charging $40 for one-hour execution. It includes Linux data storage, execution, and licensing. Usually, IBM doesn't charge anything separately on the licensing side.įor storage and everything else, we are paying around $6,000 per month, which is not very high. We have group licensing at the company level. "Our internal team takes care of group licensing and cost. I would also like to see better data profiling information being reported on InfoSphere." "The initial setup could be more straightforward." "The setup is extremely difficult." "It would be useful to provide support for Python, AR, and Java." "Currently lacking virtualization ability." "The interface needs improvement." "The pricing should be lower." In terms of additional features, I would like to see good reporting on performance and performance-tuning recommendations that can be based on AI. It should be more structured and elaborate. We tried to get hold of API documentation, but the documentation is not very well thought out. While building APIs, we had a lot of problems trying to get around it because it is not very user-friendly. We would like to have new features and new technologies." "Its documentation is not up to the mark. In higher versions, they only do small changes. It takes a lot of time for around 5 or 6 million records, and we are not able to provide real-time data to the vendors due to this delay. There should also be a user-friendly way to interact with the cloud. It would be good to have them because most of the systems are moving towards big data. "It doesn't have any big data connections.
0 kommentar(er)
